Click here to contact us by e-mail
 
• about the authors
• about the typeface used
• about the publisher
 
• from my educational dealer
• from my wholesaler
• from my bookseller
directly
 
• and my child 
• and my school
• and the latest research
 
More information...
 
How to order...
 
The materials
 
Jolly Phonics...
Helping the school achieve
by Dr Marlynne Grant,
Chartered Educational Psychologist
 
 
When I first came across Jolly Phonics I was looking for an early literacy programme which was in line with the experimental research. I was impressed by the main elements of the Jolly Phonics teaching method and its other important feature: a brisk pace of learning. It advocates learning letter sounds at the rate of one per day. This pace enables children from the outset to see how sounds are used in real words. Its auditory training and interactive teaching methods also engage children’s attention and help their memory so that they can learn at an early stage how to use their knowledge of sounds to read and write independently.
 
My role as Educational Psychologist involves me daily with children who have reading and writing difficulties. At St Michael’s School, I have had close contact with Trudy Wainwright as Reading and Special Needs Teacher. We would plan individual teaching for such children and as I became familiar with Jolly Phonics I began to introduce ideas from The Phonics Handbook. However our discussions were always far-reaching and we took every opportunity to talk about whole school literacy teaching. I was keen to introduce a systematics phonics programme like Jolly Phonics for all children in Reception from the beginning, not just as an afterthought when difficulties arose. Trudy was receptive but cautious as she knew how well-established existing teaching practices were at Key Stage 1. Then she attended some training in Jolly Phonics which I gave to a group of Speech & Language Therapists. Trudy took further ideas back to St Michael’s where increasing interest was growing among the staff. Eventually a decision was taken, supported by Senior Management, to ‘go for it’.
 
Some apprehensions remained about the changes, and staff wondered if they could possibly teach at the astonishing rate of one letter sound per day. But success was within their grasp and after three months they had covered all 42 phonemes and had achieved excellent reading and spelling results. What marked out the success at St Michael’s was their decision as a whole staff to raise their expectations and ‘take the plunge’. This made all the difference – a partial dabbling would have been much less effective. The Using Jolly Phonics video
and some whole-school training helped to give staff the confidence and to firm their resolve during the planning stage. The school also involved parents who helped to prepare the materials for the Summer Term start date.
Inevitably, the initial focus with Jolly Phonics is on teaching the letter sounds and actions, which is great fun. But there is more to the teaching method and schools often need some guidance and encourage-ment to get children to use these sounds in words from the very beginning. Within the first two weeks of starting the programme, the children know sufficient letter sounds to blend them into real words and to identify the sounds in real words. Such success is marvellous but it is quite within the reach of all schools given a willingness to make changes, to raise expectations and to have a go at a brisk pace of learning.
 
At St Michael’s we are now into another academic year. The new Reception children have already begun the Jolly Phonics  programme and those children now in Year 1 who started last Summer Term need to move on, to sustain and develop their flying start. Again at this point schools may need some support and encouragement to understand the complexities of the next stages where further phonics, alternative spellings, more advanced blending and phonological awareness training, and a systematic spelling programme should be tackled. All these aspects are covered in the Jolly Phonics programme, but this is not always recognised. Some schools just introduce the basic letter sounds, then leave it at that. Their children will certainly have had a flying start, but their rate of progress is less likely to be sustained.
 
Thanks to the Jolly Phonics programe, the special needs provision at St Michael’s can now be more precisely targeted to the very few children who have been slow starters. As their Educational Psychologist I have already been asked to assess two of these children. Because of their systematic start it was possible to identify the specific letter sounds which these children had not grasped. In both cases it was also evident that the children needed a greater emphasis on blending and phonological awareness training.
 
Given the enthusiasm and raised expectations which Jolly Phonics makes possible I look forward to working with St Michael’s in the future to deepen their understanding of Jolly Phonics and to witness continuing progress in their literacy achievements. It has been exciting to work with them.